Legal Opinion

Schulenburg v. Signatrol, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 23, 1964No. Gen. 10,510PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Plaintiffs manufacture and sell devices for automatically making and breaking electrical circuits. Such devices known in the trade as flashers are used in display signs where changing light patterns or a flashing effect is thought desirable. Plaintiffs were first in the field, at least they were there before defendants, all of whom are former employees who left to form their own competing company, Signatrol, also a defendant. For our purposes we can group defendants as one as we can the various plaintiffs. The lower court issued an injunction restraining defendants from the further…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tabor v. . HoffmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Junker v. PlummerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  3. Essex Trust Co. v. EnwrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Schulenburg v. Signatrol, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Board of Trade v. Dow Jones & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co. v. Continental Aviation & Engineering Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1966
  4. The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Christopher P. SipulaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Revcor, Inc. v. Fame, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API