Legal Opinion
People v. Hartman
California Supreme Court
Decided August 12, 1881No. 10,535PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of conviction, and from an order denying a new trial, in the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Rolfe, J.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court :
The appellant was indicted for the crime of grand larceny, and on the trial the District Attorney was permitted, against the objection of defendant, to introduce evidence tending to show that the defendant had at another time stolen other property than that described in the indictment. This was error. (Walker v. Commonwealth, 1 Leigh, 574; State v. Daubert, 42 Mo. 242; State v. Goetz, 34 Mo. 85.)
Judgment and order reversed.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. DaubertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1868
- Walker v. CommonwealthGeneral Court of Virginia · 1829
- State v. GoetzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1863
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. EllisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- People v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Williams v. CasebeerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.