Legal Opinion

Hendrickson v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1973No. State 36PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

“A greater latitude of proof as to other like occurrences is allowed in cases of sexual crimes.” This was said by this court in a rape case. 1 In that case this court held admissible testimony as to an earlier incident in which the defendant had gone to the room where the complaining witness and another girl were sleeping and gotten into bed with them. This court termed such earlier incident “a grossly indecent assault on both.” 2

Such greater latitude of proof as to other like occurrences is evident in other Wisconsin cases. In an assault to commit rape, where the trial court admitted…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Whitty v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. People v. CovertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Proper v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Lanphere v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Staggers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Getz v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  2. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  3. State v. HaseltineCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  4. State v. TarrellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. FriedrichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API