Legal Opinion · Dissent

Seminatore v. Climaco, Climaco, Seminatore, Lefkowitz & Garofoli

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 1, 2002No. 78931Published

1Dissent

Karpinski, Administrative Judge,

dissenting in part.

{¶ 39} With regard to appellant’s Assignments of Error III and IV, relating to the court granting appellees’ motion for sanctions against him, I concur with the majority’s decision to overrule these claimed errors because of appellant’s failure to provide this court with either a transcript from the sanctions hearing or any of the other items specified in App.R. 9. 1

{¶ 40} . On Assignments I and II, however, I dissent. The majority ignores what, to my mind, is a glaring procedural error committed by the trial court and which, left unremedied…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Celebrezze v. NetzleyOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. McConnell v. Hunt Sports EnterprisesOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Cassidy v. GlossipOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Price v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State, Ex Rel. Millington v. WeirOhio Court of Appeals · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API