Legal Opinion
Barber Asphalt Co. v. Stulzsickles Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 21, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, District Judge.
This is a dispute between two manufacturers of bituminous (asphalt) emulsion (the Barber Asphalt Company and the Leitch Manufacturing Company, Inc.). Joined as a defendant is the jobber (StulzSickles Company), who sold the product to the ultimate consumer, a road contractor (Standard Bithulithic Company). The plaintiff company had more foresight than the defendant company. It acquired a patent (to Hayden, No. 1,684,671) covering a process for the treatment of a road concrete with the said bituminous emulsion. It will thus be noticed that we are being asked to enjoin a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Carbice Corp. of America v. American Patents Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Morgan Envelope Co. v. Albany Perforated Wrapping Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Market Street Cable Railway Co. v. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Carbice Corp. of America v. American Patents Development Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Leitch Manufacturing Co. v. Barber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Barber Asphalt Corp. v. La Fera Grecco Contracting Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
- Barber Asphalt Corp. v. La Fera Grecco Contracting Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1939
- Barber Asphalt Corp. v. La Fera Grecco Contracting Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940