Carbice Corp. of America v. American Patents Development Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice Brandéis
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The Circuit Court of Appeals held the patent valid and infringed. 38 F. (2d) 62. In our opinion delivered March 9, 1931, we found it unnecessary to determine the validity of the patent, because we held that the bill should be dismissed on the ground that the owner of a patent may not limit its use so as to require that unpatented materials employed in practicing the invention shall be purchased only from the licensor, ante, p. 27. On March 16, 1931, the Carbice Corporation petitioned that the Court rule also on the validity of the patent.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hollister v. Benedict & Burnham Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Dreyfus v. SearleSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
3Cited by28 opinions
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Dawson Chemical Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Permutit Co. v. Graver Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Sylvania Industrial Corporation v. Visking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
- Hazeltine Corporation v. Radio Corporation of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.