Legal Opinion

Sinclair v. District of Columbia

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 4, 1904No. 94PublishedCited by 3 opinions

ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fuller

Plaintiff in error was prosecuted by information in the Police Court of the District of Columbia, for a violation of an act of Congress, approved February 2, 1899, entitled “An act for the prevention of smoke in the District of Columbia, and for other purposes,” 30 Stat. .812, c. 79, and was found and adjudged guilty, and sentenced “to pay a fine of fifty dollars and in default to be committed to the workhouse for the term of ninety days.” The judgment'was affirmed by the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, 20 D. C. App. -336, brought here on error, and argued on the merits and on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. SangesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. United States v. MoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1805
  3. Winston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Cross v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. In Re HeathSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Milton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. Rothschild & Co. v. Sons Piano Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Fields v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API