Legal Opinion
United States v. Ring
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 10, 2014No. Criminal No. 2008-0274PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, United States District Judge
Defendant Kevin A. Ring has moved to unseal portions of a government PowerPoint presentation provided to him during a preindictment reverse proffer session on February 15, 2008. (Def.’s Mot. to Unseal, Dec. 23, 2013 [ECF No. 314] (“Mot.”).) Defendant moves to unseal the document so that the public can obtain information about prosecutors’ charging decisions and the plea bargaining process. For the reasons stated below, the Court denies defendant’s motion.
BACKGROUND
The material facts and statutory framework relevant to this…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hollingsworth v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Saena Tech CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- In Re: Application for Access to Certain Sealed Video ExhibitsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- In the Matter of the Application of the Public Defender Service for the District of Columbia to Unseal Certain RecordsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022