Legal Opinion
United States v. Saena Tech Corporation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 21, 2015No. Criminal No. 2014-0066PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Judge
The United States Attorney is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all; and whose interest, therefore, in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done.
Berger v. United States, 295 U.S. 78, 88, 55 S.Ct. 629, 79 L.Ed. 1314 (1935). Prosecutors are provided with many tools to use in the pursuit of justice and are granted significant discretion to decide how…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Fokker Services B.V.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- In Re: Naoise RyanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
- In re Appl. of CoverSuperior Court of Guam · 2026
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Marcus D. Jackson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.