Legal Opinion
George S. Bailey v. Agusto G. Dequevedo and K. E. Van Buskirk
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 3, 1967No. 15457_1PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
KALODNER, Circuit Judge.
Can an enlisted man in the United States Army maintain an action against an Army medical surgeon for alleged malpractice in an operation performed at an Army hospital?
The District Court answered this question in the negative and dismissed the action. 1 This appeal followed.
The record discloses that the plaintiff, George S. Bailey, instituted this diversity action in the court below against the defendants Agusto G. DeQuevedo and K. E. Van Buskirk, Army doctors, alleging in his complaint that while he was an Army enlisted man, DeQuevedo neg ligently…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. MaloneySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- George S. Bailey v. K. E. Van BuskirkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Solenoid Devices, Inc. v. Ledex, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- James B. Stanley v. Central Intelligence Agency United States Department of Defense U.S. ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Sheila M. Jackson v. Paul A. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1980
- Hefley v. Textron, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Bois v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.