Legal Opinion

George S. Bailey v. K. E. Van Buskirk

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 26, 1965No. 19490_1PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff, an enlisted man in the United States army, in this diversity action sues two army medical surgeons 1 personally for alleged malpractice in an operation performed at Letterman Army Hospital at San Francisco. He says negligent leaving of surgical sutures in the kidney area on the first operation necessitated a second operation and the removal of a kidney.

The district court dismissed the action, holding that an army doctor in the facts here is entitled to immunity. We affirm.

Counsel for Bailey pleads and argues his case with skill and ingenuity. We think the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. James B. Stanley v. Central Intelligence Agency United States Department of Defense U.S. ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. William Trerice v. Dan A. Pedersen, Captain, U.S. Navy, Commanding Officer, Uss RangerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. Carl J. Mollnow v. Paul K. CarltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Jon Edward Hass, for the Sole Use and Benefit of the United States of America, and Jon Edward Hass, Individually v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
  5. Bois v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API