Legal Opinion

Farnsworth v. Hyde

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1973PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

Plaintiff alleged the defendants libeled him and sought damages. The defendant Hyde filed a demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint which was sustained and upon judgment in favor of Hyde, plaintiff appealed. Dial Press, Inc., is no longer a party.

The defendant Hyde wrote a book in which he stated:

“There was a house of sorts, woman’s carpentry mostly, since A1 [plaintiff] was lazy.
“* * * [A]lthough a roaring fire took care of that [wind blowing through the house], as long as Mamie [plaintiff’s wife] would get the wood.
“Through Mamie’s industry, they built a barn and corrals for the horses and thin,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Peck v. Tribune Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Andreason v. Guard Publishing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Reiman v. Pacific Development SocietyOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. McFadden v. Morning Journal Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  5. Fowler v. StradleyOregon Supreme Court · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Neumann v. LilesOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Wallulis v. DymowskiOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Reesman v. HighfillOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Kraemer v. HardingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Bock v. ZittenfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API