Farnsworth v. Hyde
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.
Plaintiff alleged the defendants libeled him and sought damages. The defendant Hyde filed a demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint which was sustained and upon judgment in favor of Hyde, plaintiff appealed. Dial Press, Inc., is no longer a party.
The defendant Hyde wrote a book in which he stated:
“There was a house of sorts, woman’s carpentry mostly, since A1 [plaintiff] was lazy.
“* * * [A]lthough a roaring fire took care of that [wind blowing through the house], as long as Mamie [plaintiff’s wife] would get the wood.
“Through Mamie’s industry, they built a barn and corrals for the horses and thin,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Peck v. Tribune Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Andreason v. Guard Publishing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Reiman v. Pacific Development SocietyOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- McFadden v. Morning Journal Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Fowler v. StradleyOregon Supreme Court · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Neumann v. LilesOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Wallulis v. DymowskiOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Reesman v. HighfillOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Kraemer v. HardingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Bock v. ZittenfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.