Legal Opinion
Chicago City Railway Co. v. Mogk
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided February 9, 1892PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. B„ W. Clifford, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtGary, J.
This is action on the ease by the appellee against the appellant for negligence. He was six years old at the time of the injury. To do full justice to his counsel this statement of facts is taken from the brief of appellee:
“ The plaintiff, appellee here, ran along in the street between the two tracks and on the north side of the car. He must have run faster than the car was traveling, for before it had gone a distance of two hundred feet, he ivas opposite and near to the forward or eastern platform, on which the driver ivas sitting or standing. As the boy approached the forward steps and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Arasmith v. TempleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1882
3Cited by4 opinions
- Crelly v. Missouri & Kansas Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- Orr v. BoockholdtAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913
- Kincade v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Devine v. Chicago City Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1911