Crucible Steel Forge Co. v. Moir
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio; William R. Day, Judge. Action by Catherine Moir, as administratrix of the estate of ThomasMoir, deceased, against the Crucible Steel Forge Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.
Defendant in error recovered verdict and judgment for alleged negligent injuries resulting in the death of decedent. The most prominent question concerns the refusal to direct verdict for defendant. Three grounds are urged in support of this alleged error:(a) Lack of evidence tending to show that the negligence complained of was the proximate cause of the accident. At the time of the accident decedent was operating a turning lathe in defendant’s machine-shop. This lathe comprised a face plate 36 inches in diameter, on the-surface of which was bolted a projecting driver…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Byers v. Carnegie Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
- Carnegie Steel Co. v. ByersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
- Pittsburgh, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. GlinnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- Worthington v. ElmerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Harmon v. BarberCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
- Clark v. McNeillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
- Shadoan v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. BellCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1928
- Eisenhuth v. MoneyhonOhio Supreme Court · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.