Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kentucky Judicial Conduct Commission v. Woods

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 2000No. 2000-SC-0607-OAPublished

1DissentKeller, Justice

I respectfully dissent because the majority opinion incorrectly holds that the authority to remove a judge from office encompasses the separate and distinct authority to disqualify a judge from holding future judicial office. While Kentucky Constitution § 121 grants the Kentucky Judicial Conduct Commission (hereinafter, “the Commission”) the power to divest a judge of his or her office, the electorate of this Commonwealth has reserved only to the General Assembly the power to prohibit a former judge from holding future judicial office. The Commission removed Woods from office in its order of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In the Matter of ProbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Nicholson v. Judicial Retirement & Removal CommissionKentucky Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. TartarCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
  4. In Re JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  5. Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. HardestyKentucky Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API