Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Tartar

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 4, 1951PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLAY, Commissioner.

The Commonwealth has asked for a certification of law on the question of whether or not an indictment for misfeasance in office, alleging the failure of a circuit judge to perform a statutory duty, charges a criminal offense. A demurrer to the indictment was sustained.

The indictment sets forth that appellee, acting in his official capacity as circuit judge, wrongfully and corruptly certified to the Clinton Circuit Court Clerk a list of grand jurors, some of whose names had not been drawn from a jury wheel or <Srum. Though the indictment makes no mention of it, the statute…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Yates v. LansingCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1811
  3. Mundy v. McDonaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. In Re the New Jersey State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. HastingsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  2. In Re United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  3. In Re: Leon A. Kendall v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  4. In Re: Leon A. Kendall v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  5. Julie Muth Goodman v. Jason Nemes, in His Official Capacity as Chair of the House of Representatives Impeachment CommitteeKentucky Supreme Court · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API