Legal Opinion

London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Doyle & Doak

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1905No. 37PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion to Punish for Contempt.

1Opinion of the Court

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

The plaintiff’s cause of action against the defendants sufficiently appears in the following quotation from the court’s opinion upon demurrer to a bill in equity between the same parties, reported in 130 Fed., at page 719:

“As set forth in the bill, the plaintiff corporation is engaged in the business of insuring employers of labor against loss on account of liability incurred by them through injuries incurred by their employés, or occasioned to others by their negligence. The defendants, who are contractors and builders, were so insured by the plaintiff during…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fenlon v. DempseyNew York Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Gilpin v. HowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1846
  3. Holly Manuf'g Co. v. VennerNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Tuttle v. Mechanics & Tradesman's Loan Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. State ex rel. Eder v. SearlesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  3. United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API