The Condor
District Court, S.D. New York
In Admiralty. In the matter of the Condor. Suit for wages. B. B. Coyne, for libelants. John M., Woolsey, for claimant.
1Opinion of the Court
HAND, District Judge.
[1] The law of this case is plain enough, and it is this: A crew- is obliged by its articles to stand by the ship and obey the master until the voyage be doné, unless she come to such a pass as to be dangerous to human life. Hartley v. Ponsonby, 7 El. & B. 872; The Shawnee (D. C.) 45 Fed. 769; U. S. v. Ashton, 2 Sumn. 13, Fed. Cas. No. 14,470; The Heroe (D. C.) 21 Fed. 525; U. S. v. Nye, 2 Curt. 225, Fed. Cas. No. 15,906; The Hibernia, 1 Spr. 78, Fed. Cas. No. 6,455; U. S. v. Givings, 1 Spr. 75, Fed. Cas. No. 15,212; The C. F. Sargent (D. C.) 95 Fed. J79. It is the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. AshtonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1834
- United States v. NyeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1855
- The HeroeDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1884
- McKenna v. The ShawneeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1891
- The HiberniaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1844
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hamilton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1920
- Heino v. Libby, McNeill & LibbyWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Roeder v. Alcoa Steamship Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972