Heino v. Libby, McNeill & Libby
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judment of the superior court for King county, Smith, J., entered April 27, 1920, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, in consolidated actions to recover seamen’s wages, after a trial on the merits.
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
These actions, ten in number, were brought by ten of a crew of seamen and fishermen, suing for themselves and as assignee for collection of eighty-four others, to recover wages claimed to have been earned by them under a contract of employment. The ten cases were consolidated for trial under the title of Heino v. Libby, McNeill & Libby. From six to twelve cases are included in each suit. In each suit the plaintiff alleges his employment and that of his assignors and that he was given certificates showing stated amounts which appellant refused to pay.
Appellant answered in each case, the answer…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Union Fish Co. v. EricksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Alaska Packers' Ass'n v. DomenicoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
- Lingenfelder v. Wainwright Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1890
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alaska Packers Ass'n v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Jackson v. Mitsui CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Roswall v. Grays Harbor Stevedore Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
- The Z R—3District Court, W.D. New York · 1927