Legal Opinion

Bulatovic v. Dobritchanin

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 19, 1993No. 1-91-2740PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Buckley

The plaintiffs, Svetozar and Leposava Bulatovic, filed a seven-count, second-amended complaint against numerous defendants arising out of a business deal which involved the acquisition, development and sale of certain real property. The trial court granted judgment on the pleadings (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 110, par. 2 — 615 (now 735 ILCS 5/2 — 615 (West 1992))) for defendants on plaintiffs’ count in ejectment on the grounds that as a matter of law defendants had “sufficient title here to resist any action for ejectment.” The trial court also denied both parties’ cross-motions for sanctions.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. Fruehauf Division of Fruehauf Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  2. Church v. AdlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1953
  3. Old Salem Chautauqua Ass'n v. Illinois District Council of Assembly of GodIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Hakala v. Illinois Dodge City Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  5. Wegman v. PrattAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Heastie v. RobertsIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Wilder v. FinneganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. Romano v. Village of GlenviewAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  4. Zabel v. CohnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  5. Cree Development Corp. v. Mid-America Advertising Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API