Legal Opinion

O'Neil v. Donahue

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1881No. 6,720PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment, and order denying anew trial, and an order denying defendant’s motion to strike out the plaintiff’s cost bill, in the Nineteenth District Court, City and County of San Francisco. Wheeler, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Thornton, J.:

This action was brought to recover damages for the conversion of forty-five shares of the capital stock of the Omnibus Railroad Company. The cause was tried by the Court, and judgment passed for plaintiff. Defendant moved for a new trial, which was denied ; and this appeal is from the judgment and order denying a new trial.

The Court below rendered its decision as follows:

“ This cause was tried by the Court, sitting without a jury, and the Court finds as follows :
“ 1. J ames O’Neil died September 5th, 1876, and plaintiff was appointed and duly qualified as administratrix on the…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dow v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Mallory v. SeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Fisher v. EckertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Mullally v. Irish-American Benevolent SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Holmes v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API