Apex Medical Research, AMR, Inc. v. Arif
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
AMY J. ST. EVE, District Court Judge
Before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Apex Medical Research, AMR, Inc. (“Apex AMR”), moved for partial summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 on its claims for breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty against Defendant Ahmed A. Arif (“Dr. Arif’). (R.30.) Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants, Apex AMR and Apex Medical Research, MI, Inc. (“Apex Michigan” or “Apex-MI”), and Counter-Defendant Nus-rat Deen Ahmed (“Ms. Ahmed”) (collectively, the “Apex Parties”) also moved for…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Cracco v. Vitran Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Diligent Payments, LLC v. Carpay, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025
- The Driscoll Firm, P.C. v. Federal City Law Group, PLLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
- Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Pactrans Air & Sea, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017