Legal Opinion

Bahena v. Sun & Chang Inc

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided May 5, 2020No. 3:20-cv-00232Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION FERNANDO BAHENA, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) vs. ) CAUSE NO. 3:20-cv-232 RLM-MGG ) SUN & CHANG, INC. et al., ) ) Defendants ) OPINION AND ORDER Fernando Bahena filed a collective action on March 16, 2020, alleging that his former employer didn’t pay him overtime in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act,

29 U.S.C. §§ 201

et seq. He joined Kuang N. Chang, Sun & Chang, Inc., and Geo DA, Inc. as defendants. On April 6, Mr. Bahena filed a joint motion for settlement approval. The FLSA is designed to protect workers from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Trudy WALTON, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED CONSUMERS CLUB, INCORPORATED, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  4. Anderson Ex Rel. Painters' District Council No. 30 Health & Welfare Fund v. AB Painting & Sandblasting Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  5. Burkholder v. City of Fort WayneDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API