Legal Opinion

In re Blumrosen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 1, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent, Steven M. Blumrosen, was admitted to practice as an attorney in the State of New York on February 4, 1985 *240by the Appellate Division, First Department, under the name Steven Marshall Blumrosen. At all times relevant herein, respondent practiced law outside this State.

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee moves, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.3, for an order suspending respondent from the practice of law predicated upon similar discipline issued by the Supreme Court of the State of Arizona, or, in the alternative, sanctioning respondent as this Court deems…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re GordonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. In re SiegelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. In re DenhofferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. In re McEnroeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. In re CorcoranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re SaghirDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  2. In re StreitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API