In re Scales
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OPINION RE: “MOTION FOR USDA — RURAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT TO APPEAR AND SHOW CAUSE WHY IT SHOULD NOT BE FOUND IN CONTEMPT OF COURT” [DOCKET # 16]
MARILYN SHEA-STONUM, Bankruptcy Judge.
On January 30, 2012, the Court entered a “Memorandum Opinion Re: (1) Debtor’s ‘Amended Motion for Turnover of Property [Docket # 15] and (2) Debtor’s ‘Motion for USDA-Rural Housing Development to *514Appear and Show Cause Why it Should not be Found in Contempt of Court’ [Docket # 16]” (the “Initial Memorandum Opinion”). [The Initial Memorandum Opinion is incorporated by this reference as if…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sorenson v. Secretary of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Beaucage v. United States Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
- Larsen v. LarsenDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1987
- Morris v. Duffy (In re Duffy)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2003
3Cited by1 opinion
- U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural Housing Service v. RileyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2012