Legal Opinion
Hampton v. Oklahoma
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided May 2, 1967No. Civ. No. 66-510PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAUGHERTY, District Judge.
The petitioner, James Dwain Hampton, a state prisoner, complains that he was denied a speedy trial by the State of Oklahoma in violation of his constitutional rights. Pursuant to Hampton v. State of Oklahoma, et al., (Tenth Cir.-1966) 368 F.2d 9, an evidentiary hearing was conducted in this Court after the case was transferred to this District from the Eastern District of Oklahoma pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). Counsel was appointed by the Court for the petitioner.
The Court finds from the evidence that an information was filed in Kiowa County,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Pollard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States of America Ex Rel. Louis Von Cseh v. Edward M. Fay, Warden of Greenhaven State Prison, Stormville, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Pietch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- McLeod v. Graham, County JudgeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1974
- Washington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1969
- Cody v. PageDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1969
- Tuggle v. OklahomaDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1967