Legal Opinion
Cody v. Page
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided February 24, 1969No. Civ. No. 68-517PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, District Judge.
Petitioner, a state prisoner serving 99 years for first degree rape, proceeds herein by Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He raises three Complaints as grounds for the Writ, as follows:
1. Petitioner was proceeded against by Information and was denied his right to be indicted by a Grand Jury of the State of Oklahoma,
2. Petitioner was not afforded a speedy trial in that his first conviction was reversed on appeal and he was thereby subjected to a second trial, and,
3. Petitioner’s rights to be informed of the nature of the charge against him and to be…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Lem Woon v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Cody v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1961
- Robert Lee Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brown v. PettigrewDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2025