Legal Opinion

Sutton v. Tomco Machining, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 2010No. 23416PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brogan, Judge.

I

{¶ 1} On the morning of April 14, 2008, DeWayne Sutton was working at Torneo Machining, disassembling a chop saw, when he injured his back.1 Sutton went to Tomco’s president, Jim Tomasiak, and told him about his injury. Within an hour of talking with Tomasiak, Tomasiak discharged Sutton from his employment as an at-will employee. Tomasiak gave Sutton no affirmative reason for discharging him, but he did tell Sutton that it was not because of his work ethic or job performance or because Sutton had violated any work rule or company policy. Following his discharge, Sutton filed a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hanson v. Guernsey County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Greeley v. Miami Valley Maintenance Contractors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Collins v. RizkanaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Wiles v. Medina Auto PartsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Gawloski v. Miller Brewing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Howard v. Bobby D. Thompson, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Sutton v. Tomco Machining, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API