Legal Opinion · Dissent

Strowman v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 9, 1998Published

1DissentAndidas, J.

Generally, in the face of proof that the area in which plaintiff fell had been swept within five or ten minutes of the accident, evidence that the banana peel on which plaintiff allegedly slipped and fell was “crushed and dirty” would be insufficient, by itself, to show that defendant had constructive notice of a dangerous condition (see, Maiorano v Price Chopper Operating Co., 221 AD2d 698). However, we need not reach the sufficiency of plaintiffs prima facie case on this motion for summary judgment by defendant, which, as the proponent of a motion for summary judgment, “ ‘must make a prima…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gordon v. American Museum of Natural HistoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Colt v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Maiorano v. Price Chopper Operating Company, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Cameron v. H. C. Bohack Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  5. Van Steenburg v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API