Legal Opinion

Noffsinger v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 3, 1936No. 13,605PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AN action of one partner against the other for an accounting. Briefly, the issue was whether defendant was indebted to plaintiff, and if so, in what sum. The matter was submitted to arbitration under chapter 27, Code of Civil Procedure. By determination of two of three arbitrators chosen, the third formally dissenting, plaintiff was denied recovery, and he sought by motion to impeach the award pursuant to section 320 of the Code. To the overruling of his motion he assigns error.

Although other grounds are urged, we examine only plaintiff's claim that one of the arbitrators joining in the award…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Colorado Bar Ass'n v. LindseySupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  2. Lantry Contracting Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1918

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brennan v. Stewarts' Pharmacies, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Owners Ins. Co. v. Dakota Station II Condo. Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2019
  3. Gaddis Mining Co. v. Continental Materials Corp.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1961
  4. McNaughton & Rodgers v. BesserColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Petrol Corporation v. Groupement D'Achat Des Car.District Court, S.D. New York · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API