Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hoffman v. City of Muscatine

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 26, 1930No. 39941Published

1DissentGrimm, J.

(dissenting). — I. I cannot agree with the majority opinion in this case. It is the claim of the defendants (appellees) that inasmuch as there is here no attack made upon the validity of the proceedings on the part of the City Council, therefore, the City Council had jurisdiction in “the matter of ordering the improvement and entering into the contract, and that this suit in equity will not lie to question the legality of the contract.

It is the contention of the defendants (appellees) that the procedure set out in Sections 6016, 6029, 6063, and 6065 of the Code is exclusive, and that it was…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. McMullen v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Zottman v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  3. McDonald v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  4. McPherson v. Foster Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  5. Cedar Rapids Water Co. v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API