Central Bank of the South v. Beasley
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
These are appeals from a declaratory judgment action seeking an injunction to prevent the enforcement of a noncompetition covenant. The trial court found that the covenant was overbroad, modified the covenant, and enjoined Central Bank of the South (Central) from enforcing the covenant except as modified. We reverse and remand.
The issues presented for review are whether the trial court erred in determining that the covenant was (1) not void, (2) overbroad in geographic scope, and (3) overbroad in duration. Additionally, Central asks this Court to clarify the trial court's meaning of the term…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hill v. RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Cullman Broadcasting Co. v. BosleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- DeVoe v. CheathamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- First Alabama Bancshares, Inc. v. McGaheySupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Samford v. First Alabama Bank of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kershaw v. Knox Kershaw, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. CornuttCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Unisource Worldwide, Inc. v. South Central Alabama Supply, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001
- CENT. BANCSHARES OF THE SOUTH v. PuckettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Benchmark Medical Holdings, Inc. v. BarnesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.