Legal Opinion

Glauser v. Scofield

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 26, 1909No. Appeal, No. 201PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal, No. 201, Oct. T., 1908, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Delaware Co., Dec. T., 1907, No. 2, for defendant on the whole record in case of Stacy G. Glauser and Edwin D. Glauser, trading as Stacy G. Glauser & Son, v. Glenn M. Scofield, owner or reputed owner, and the Scofield Company, contractors. Scire facias sur mechanic’s lien. Before Johnson, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion ofi'the Superior Court.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 201, Oct. T., 1908, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Delaware Co., Dec. T., 1907, No. 2, for defendant on the whole record in case of Stacy G. Glauser and Edwin D. Glauser, trading as Stacy G. Glauser & Son, v. Glenn M. Scofield, owner or reputed owner, and the Scofield Company, contractors. Scire facias sur mechanic’s lien. Before Johnson, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion ofi'the Superior Court. Error assigned was in entering judgment for plaintiff on the whole record.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Beaver, J.,

The plaintiffs furnished labor and materials for, and entering into, the construction of a building upon land belonging to the defendant, Glenn M. Scofield, and, so far as the public records showed, belonging to him alone, the deed to him individually being recorded March 15, 1907. On May 23, 1907, the Scofield company ordered certain materials for this building from the plaintiffs, and at sundry times subsequently the plaintiffs furnished materials upon the orders of the said, the Scofield company, up to and including August 30, 1907, amounting to $1,411.77, subject to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rhawn v. Edge Hill Furnace Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Seelar v. East End Mantel & Tile Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API