Rhawn v. Edge Hill Furnace Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 188, Jan. T., 1901, by Heller, Hirsh & Company, from decree of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., March T., 1898, No. 688, dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report in case of William H. Rhawn and Charles E. Pancoast v. Edge Hill Furnace Company. Exceptions to report of J. E. Carpenter, Esq., auditor. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Errors assigned were in dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Justice Mestbezat,
In January and February, 1888, Charles Richardson conveyed to the Edge Hill Furnace Company, incorporated under the laws of Pennsylvania, certain real estate situate in Montgomery county. The consideration for this conveyance was the delivery to Mr. Richardson of 200 coupon bonds of the corporation, each of the par value of $1,000, secured by a first mortgage on the premises. There was also issued to Mr. Richardson, with the exception of a few shares, all the capital stock of the corporation amounting to $200,000. The mortgage was dated February 1, 1888. The…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Macan v. Scandinavia Belting Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Commonwealth v. Monongahela Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Tustin v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Anania v. SerentaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Glauser v. ScofieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.