Legal Opinion

Playmates Toys Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 21, 1999PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division allowing the Director of the Division of Taxation to recover a refund mistakenly paid to a taxpayer after the statute of limitations had passed on the taxpayer’s right to seek a refund for overpayments in prior years. We do so substantially for the reasons stated by the Appellate Division in its opinion reported at 316 N.J.Super. 509, 720 A.2d 655 (1998). We add only that this judgment does not confer on the Division of Taxation an unlimited inherent authority to correct and revise erroneous tax determinations once made. The powers of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lockwood v. WalshNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1946
  2. Playmates Toys v. Director of Tax.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Quigley v. KPMG PEAT MARWICK, LIPNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  2. New Jersey Department of Labor v. Pepsi-Cola Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  3. Borromeo v. DIFLORIONew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  4. Lenox, Inc. v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 2002
  5. Hill v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API