Chisholm v. Johnson
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Delaware
In Equity.
1Opinion of the Court
BRADFORD, District Judge.
The bill charges infringement of four patents, namely, patent No. 387,318, dated August 7, 1888, granted to the complainant Robert P. Scott, patent No. 499,397, dated June 13, 1893, also granted to the same complainant, patent' No. 421,244, dated February 11, 1890, granted to the complainants Charles P. Chisholm and John A. Chisholm, and patent No. 500,299, dated June 27, 1893, granted to all the complainants. All these patents relate to processes or machinery for hulling green peas.
It appears from the evidence that the practical application of the inventions covered…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Cochrane v. DeenerSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Bates v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Oliver v. PiattSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Innis, Speiden & Co. v. Food Machinery Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1942
- Elliott & Hatch Book-Typewriter Co. v. Fisher Typewriter Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1901
- Holliday v. Long Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1955
- Texas Produce Exchange v. SorrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.