Legal Opinion
Greensboro Elks Lodge v. North Carolina Board of Alcoholic Control
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided December 3, 1975No. 7510SC557PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
Respondent-appellant contends that the court erred in concluding that applicable statutes require State and local A.B.C. and law enforcement officers to request and obtain permission to enter the premises of a permittee, and that the evidence with respect to selling whiskey and gambling presented to respondent’s hearing officer in the case at hand was inadmissible. We think the contention has merit.
G.S. 18A-19 (c) reads as follows:
“(c) All State A.B.C. officers shall have authority to investigate the operation of the licensed premises of all persons licensed under this Chapter,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Almeida-Sanchez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Moose Lodge No. 107 v. IrvisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- California v. LaRueSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. SapatchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- State v. NoblesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- State v. NoblesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992