Bingham v. San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Second District; Hon. J. A. Howell, Judge. Action by Andrew Bingham against the San Pedro-, Los Angeles and Salt Lake Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, C. J.
Respondent recovered judgment against appellant for damages be alleged were caused by its negligence as a common carrier in transporting forty-two bead of borses from Salt Lake City, Utab, to Los Angeles, Cal.; thirty-one of said borses being killed and tbe remainder injured while in transit. Appellant in its answer admitted that it bad received tbe borses for shipment to Los Angeles, but denied that it was guilty of negligence, and, as an affirmative der fense, alleged that tbe borses were shipped under a special contract wherein it was agreed by respondent that, in consideration of reduced…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Cau v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Donlon Bros. v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Calumet Stock FarmIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
- Alair v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry. v. HamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Barry v. Los Angeles & S. L. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1920
- Homer v. Oregon Short Line RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1912
- Paradise Land & Live Stock Co. v. DavisUtah Supreme Court · 1922