Legal Opinion

Berrocal v. Conrad

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 15, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2026-0707Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HENRY B. BERROCAL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 26-00707 (UNA) ) ROBERT J. CONRAD et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, appearing pro se, submitted a complaint and an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). For the following reasons, the Court grants the IFP application and dismisses the complaint. I. Plaintiff is unhoused in the District of Columbia. He sues in their personal and official capacities Director Robert J. Conrad of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, former U.S. Attorney…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API