Legal Opinion

Zahrijczuk v. Water Pollution Control Authority of Branford

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided April 10, 2012No. File No. CV-11-6024727PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlue, J.

I

INTRODUCTION

“[W]ater pollution control authorities are quasi-municipal corporations created pursuant to statute . . . .” Forest Walk, LLC v. Water Pollution Control Authority, 291 Conn. 271, 281, 968 A.2d 345 (2009). The principal question presented by the Motion To Dismiss now before the court is whether a water pollution control authority has the legal capacity to be sued. For the reasons stated below, the answer to this question is Yes.

For purposes of this motion, the factual assertions set forth in the Complaint are not contested. The plaintiff, Anna Zahrijczuk, owns a house in Branford.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Cook County v. United States Ex Rel. ChandlerSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Zizka v. Water Pollution Control AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. Community Board 7 v. SchafferNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Beta Beta Chapter of Beta Theta Pi v. MayMississippi Supreme Court · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Watrous v. Town of PrestonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
  2. Rogers v. City of New BritainDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API