Legal Opinion

Mangal v. State

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 30, 2015No. Appellate Case No. 2012-212701; No. 5372PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI

MCDONALD, J.

In 2007, Farid A. Mangal was convicted of first-degree criminal sexual conduct (CSC) with a minor, two counts of second-degree CSC, lewd act upon a minor, and incest. He appeals from the denial and dismissal of his application for post-conviction relief (PCR), arguing (1) trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to bolstering, (2) trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move for a mistrial in response to bolstering, (3) trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the qualification of a forensic interviewer as an expert, (4) trial…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. State v. JenningsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  4. State v. DawkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  5. Ard v. CatoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mangal v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  2. Woody v. TuckerDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2025
  3. Woody v. TuckerDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API