Mangal v. State
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI
MCDONALD, J.
In 2007, Farid A. Mangal was convicted of first-degree criminal sexual conduct (CSC) with a minor, two counts of second-degree CSC, lewd act upon a minor, and incest. He appeals from the denial and dismissal of his application for post-conviction relief (PCR), arguing (1) trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to bolstering, (2) trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move for a mistrial in response to bolstering, (3) trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the qualification of a forensic interviewer as an expert, (4) trial…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- State v. JenningsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- State v. DawkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- Ard v. CatoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mangal v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
- Woody v. TuckerDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2025
- Woody v. TuckerDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020