People v. McNeil
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s contention that the evidence was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he shared his codefendant’s intent to commit a fatal shooting is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- People v. MalloyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. AlmodovarNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. PoblinerNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. CarterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. HerreraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. Hu-Fu LinNew York Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. ChristodoulouAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.