Legal Opinion
United States v. Paul Knobloch
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 10, 1997No. 96-3022PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
STAPLETON, Circuit Judge:
Paul Knobloch challenges his judgment of conviction and sentence on three grounds. First, he insists that his plea to Count 5 of the indictment was not voluntary, knowing, and intelligent because the district court, in the course of the plea colloquy, misdescribed the elements of the offense charged. In addition, he contends that the court erred by imposing a role in the offense enhancement to his sentence based on testimonial evidence from a related trial, to which he had no reasonable opportunity to respond. Finally, he asserts that the court…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Jerry Washington and Herbert Edward JamesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Rodolfo BethancourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Gandia-MaysonetCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Sean Hart, Neil White, Joseph Orlando, Lawrence WeilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Carole Diaz, AKA Carole M. Cefaratti, Carole Cefaratti-DiazCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Elvis IrizarryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.