Legal Opinion
Kelly v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 4, 1950No. 901PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Appellant was convicted under an information charging that on a street in the District of Columbia he invited one Frank N. Manthos to accompany him for-a lewd or immoral purpose. Code 1940, Supp. VII, § 22 — 2701. Of the five assigned errors we find possible merit in only one, consideration of which requires some statement of the factual background.
The trial, without a jury, commenced on a Friday afternoon and the prosecution completed its case that day. The Government’s case depended almost entirely on the testimony of Manthos who at the'timé of the occurrence was a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ewing v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Ewing v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Simon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- United States v. KlassCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- United States v. SagerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ibn-Tamas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Preston v. BlackledgeDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1971
- Phillips v. MooneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- King v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
- Ibn-Tamas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.