Legal Opinion
Stirling v. Canatsey
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided April 9, 1949No. 37,517PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Wedell, J.:
This case involves the construction of a will which, omitting the introductory paragraph and attestation clause, reads:
“Item One. It is my will that all my last debts be paid, including funeral and burial expenses.
“Item Two. Any money left at Penn Mutual Insurance Company to father and mother.
“Item Three. Personal property left at various places around Iola, Kansas to Mr. and Mrs. T. 0. Canatsey, to be used or sold as they see fit.
*68“Item Four. Bonds and cash at 9th National Bank in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, (if any at my death) along with…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Clutter v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
- Dyal v. BruntSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Estate of WorksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
- In Re Estate of HauckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
- Giese v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
- Estate of Graham v. Home State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- In Re Estate of SnyderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.