Legal Opinion

Stirling v. Canatsey

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 9, 1949No. 37,517PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This case involves the construction of a will which, omitting the introductory paragraph and attestation clause, reads:

“Item One. It is my will that all my last debts be paid, including funeral and burial expenses.
“Item Two. Any money left at Penn Mutual Insurance Company to father and mother.
“Item Three. Personal property left at various places around Iola, Kansas to Mr. and Mrs. T. 0. Canatsey, to be used or sold as they see fit.
*68“Item Four. Bonds and cash at 9th National Bank in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, (if any at my death) along with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clutter v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  2. Dyal v. BruntSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of WorksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  2. In Re Estate of HauckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  3. Giese v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  4. Estate of Graham v. Home State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  5. In Re Estate of SnyderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API