Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Van

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 30, 2011No. 1D10-4206PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

ROWE, J.

We grant the appellees’ motion for rehearing, withdraw our prior opinion, and substitute the following opinion.

Daniel Schmidt, the defendant in a personal injury suit filed by Charles and Rilla Van, appeals a final order determining that the jury verdict in his favor was against the manifest weight of the evidence and awarding the Vans a new trial. Because we conclude that the trial court abused its discretion, we reverse and remand for the trial court to reinstate the jury verdict.

Facts and Procedural History

The Vans brought suit against Mr. Schmidt, seeking…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brown v. Estate of StuckeySupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Shaw v. PuleoSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
  3. Easkold v. RhodesSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  4. Wald v. GraingerSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
  5. Roach v. CSX Transp., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Van v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
  2. Kuebler v. FerrisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. Ring Power Corp. v. RosierDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  4. Philip Morris USA Inc. v. DanielsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  5. Kuebler v. FerrisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API