Legal Opinion

White v. Blum

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1876PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from the Otoe comity district court.

1Opinion of the Court

Lake, Ch. J.

This is a petition in error from Otoe county, brought to obtain a reversal of the judgment of the district court rendered against the plaintiffs in error, who were stockholders in the Midland Pacific Railway'Company, a corporation organized and doing business under the general incorporation law of this state. The defendants in error were contractors with said company for doing the grading of a certain portion of its road-bed between Nebraska City and Lincoln, and had recovered a judgment on their contract for the sum of $8,000, as a balance due them for work done thereunder. Being…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Quackenbush v. DanksCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  2. Mokelumne Hill Canal & Mining Co. v. WoodburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Davidson v. RankinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  4. State ex rel. Parker v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Globe Publishing Co. v. State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Kleckner v. TurkNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Lane v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  4. State ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. SilverNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Hendrix v. RiemanNebraska Supreme Court · 1877

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API