Legal Opinion
Upstrem, Inc. v. BHFO, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided May 21, 2021No. 3:20-cv-02160Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UPSTREM, INC., a California Case No.: 20-CV-2160 JLS (DEB) corporation, 12 ORDER (1) GRANTING IN PART 13 AND DENYING IN PART Plaintiff, DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO 14 v. DISMISS; (2) OVERRULING 15 DEFENDANT’S OBJECTIONS TO BHFO, Inc., an Iowa corporation, MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S ORDER; 16 AND (3) DENYING MOTION FOR A 17 PROTECTIVE ORDER Defendant. 18 (ECF Nos. 11, 23, 26) 19 20 21 Presently before the Court are three motions filed by Defendant BHFO, Inc. First is 22 Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (“MTD,” ECF No. 11-1),…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Stauffer Chemical Company, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance Company, Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Monsanto Company Reichhold Limited Fmc Corporation Bridgestone/firestone, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.