Legal Opinion

People v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 4, 2007No. D049026PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McINTYRE, Acting P. J

The issue presented in this writ proceeding is whether a defendant who is found to have committed a nonviolent drug possession offense (NDPO) is ineligible to be placed on probation and ordered to drug treatment in accordance with the mandatory provisions of Proposition 36 if, at the time of the commission of the NDPO, he was on probation for other, nonqualifying offenses. We answer this question in the negative and deny the People’s petition to set aside the superior court’s order placing defendant on probation.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In January 2006,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. People v. FloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. GuzmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. People v. EsparzaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. People v. MurilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. BradshawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API