Legal Opinion
County of Kendall v. Aurora National Bank Trust No. 1107
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided June 1, 1988No. 2-87-0720PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hopf
Defendants, Donald and Carol Hamman, are the beneficiaries of a land trust held by defendant Aurora National Bank. All of the defendants appeal from orders of the circuit court of Kendall County which temporarily and permanently enjoined them from conducting certain activities on property they own in unincorporated Kendall County. We reverse.
The parcel of land owned by defendants is zoned agricultural pursuant to the Kendall County zoning ordinance. Early in April of 1987 Donald Hamman planted sod on 90 acres of the 250-acre site at a cost of $58,900. Hamman intended to excavate a portion of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Pletcher v. City of JolietIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
- Tuftee v. County of KaneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Soil Enrichment Materials Corp. v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- County of Grundy v. Soil Enrichment Materials Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
3Cited by8 opinions
- Henry v. Board of Appeals of DunstableMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Trust v. County of YumaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- County of Kendall v. Aurora National Bank Trust No. 1107Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- County of Knox Ex Rel. Masterson v. Highlands, L.L.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- County of De Kalb v. VidmarAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.